Background
Internationally, AYA are under-represented in trials negatively impacting outcomes. Despite national ambitions in England to recruit 50% of adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer into clinical trials by 2025. Recruitment remains below target.
We set out to design a series of ‘safe-to-fail’ experiments — low-risk, exploratory interventions — to understand and improve how AYAs are approached for research, and how healthcare professionals (HCPs) experience that process within a large AYA specialist cancer centre.
Methods
We worked with Cynefin, adopting novel SenseMaker® technology combining quantitative and qualitative data with personal experiences and stories. A multidisciplinary professional group and patient group co-created a bespoke interactive survey capturing data utilising open ended, triad and dyad questions. Both groups were involved in analysis, interpretation and constraint mapping to inform the safe-to-fail experiments.
Outcomes
Multiple datasets were analysed, including SenseMaker® Surveys and workshop transcripts and outputs. Sixteen AYA, diagnosed with cancer aged 16-26 and 16 healthcare professionals (HCP) completed the SenseMaker® survey. Four themes emerged:
Impact on practice
Four key themes emerged:
Constraint mapping identified three safe-to-fail experiments around communication, education and embedding research within the wider hospital environment.
Discussion
Psychosocial interventions may improve recruitment of AYA to cancer trials. In our centre, uptake of the survey was low for both AYA and professionals, therefore utilisation of the full SenseMaker® methodology was not possible and highlights the need to improve recruitment strategies for AYA.